All views expressed here are solely my own and do not represent those of the American Museum of Natural History.
This week, I had the strange opportunity to take typeface identification from an obscure, seemingly pointless, albeit strangely self-satisfying skill to a matter of design integrity.
Between all the work of designing exhibits and helping visualize content at the American Museum of Natural History, there are odds and ends we take care of in the exhibit graphics department. From time to time, someone will need a sign for this or that, and we'll see about getting it made. Because our visitors at AMNH can get a bit, er, overzealous at times, we end up with signs here and there that have missing letters. (Don't ask me. Your guess is as good as mine.) So the long and short of it is that we have a plaque on the fourth floor in one of the dinosaur halls (come see for yourself!) with a couple of missing letters. My mission: figure out what the typeface is so we can replace the letters.
I started with a photograph, but ended up wanting a much more accurate way to compare the still-existing letters with letterforms from various typefaces. So, in a throwback to my Florence days, I did a charcoal rubbing of the plaque on tracing paper. I used Identifont to help pull out salient features of the typeface. I must admit, I am a bit out of touch with the nitty gritty of type design. Not that I was ever a type designer, mind you, but I learned a thing or two from Paul Bussman back in the day...
I came up with what I think, unfortunately, is not the very same typeface, but an extremely close second that appears to match exactly for the characters we need to reproduce. I didn't have the entire alphabet to examine; just those letters in the words on the sign, and only majuscule at that. I am not going to tell you guys what my answer is right here. Instead, I'm going to show you all the rubbing, and leave you to the fun task of finding the guilty typeface, or at least the prime suspects. Feel free to email me your answers or to find out what mine is.
Really, all of this was a great reminder of how much I really really don't know about type.
Merry investigating!
This week, I had the strange opportunity to take typeface identification from an obscure, seemingly pointless, albeit strangely self-satisfying skill to a matter of design integrity.
Between all the work of designing exhibits and helping visualize content at the American Museum of Natural History, there are odds and ends we take care of in the exhibit graphics department. From time to time, someone will need a sign for this or that, and we'll see about getting it made. Because our visitors at AMNH can get a bit, er, overzealous at times, we end up with signs here and there that have missing letters. (Don't ask me. Your guess is as good as mine.) So the long and short of it is that we have a plaque on the fourth floor in one of the dinosaur halls (come see for yourself!) with a couple of missing letters. My mission: figure out what the typeface is so we can replace the letters.
I started with a photograph, but ended up wanting a much more accurate way to compare the still-existing letters with letterforms from various typefaces. So, in a throwback to my Florence days, I did a charcoal rubbing of the plaque on tracing paper. I used Identifont to help pull out salient features of the typeface. I must admit, I am a bit out of touch with the nitty gritty of type design. Not that I was ever a type designer, mind you, but I learned a thing or two from Paul Bussman back in the day...
I came up with what I think, unfortunately, is not the very same typeface, but an extremely close second that appears to match exactly for the characters we need to reproduce. I didn't have the entire alphabet to examine; just those letters in the words on the sign, and only majuscule at that. I am not going to tell you guys what my answer is right here. Instead, I'm going to show you all the rubbing, and leave you to the fun task of finding the guilty typeface, or at least the prime suspects. Feel free to email me your answers or to find out what mine is.
Really, all of this was a great reminder of how much I really really don't know about type.
Merry investigating!














